Questions have emerged regarding India’s handling of a reported Nipah virus outbreak, with critics alleging that the scale of infections has been understated at a time when the country is preparing to host major international sporting events, including the 2026 ICC Men’s T20 World Cup.
Indian authorities have officially acknowledged two Nipah cases in West Bengal since December 2025. However, independent reports and health-sector sources claim that at least five infections linked to hospital-based transmission have been identified in Kolkata, including cases involving healthcare workers exposed through nosocomial clusters.
Public health experts note that Nipah virus carries a high fatality rate, estimated between 40 and 75 percent, raising concerns over transparency and risk assessment. Critics argue that the alleged downplaying of the outbreak is aimed at preserving confidence in India’s preparedness as Kolkata’s Eden Gardens is listed among the World Cup host venues.
Concerns have also been raised about player and spectator safety, citing past complaints over hygiene and infrastructure standards at international sporting events held in India. During the 2026 India Open Super 750 badminton tournament, several foreign athletes reportedly raised issues related to unsanitary training facilities, poor environmental conditions, and safety concerns, with some withdrawing from competition.
Observers argue that these incidents reflect broader challenges in ensuring health and safety standards at large-scale events. Given the proximity of some cricket venues to reported outbreak areas and previous criticisms of event management, calls have been made to reconsider hosting arrangements for the T20 World Cup.
Some stakeholders have urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to relocate fixtures to Sri Lanka, citing stronger health monitoring mechanisms and comparatively safer facilities. They argue that such a move would reduce potential risks to players, officials, and spectators.““The issue has reignited debate over balancing commercial interests with public health responsibilities, with critics warning that proceeding without addressing these concerns could set a troubling precedent for international sports governance.